Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1530 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670T
- Up to 24% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €288.0 vs €379.64
- Up to 24% better value when playing Deathloop than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €1.66 vs €2.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Deathloop than Core i5-4670T - 175 vs 173 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670T - 24 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €288 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
175
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.17/FPS
76%
Price, €
€379.64
75%
FPS Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |