Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms Core i5-460M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 3504 days newer than Core i5-460M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-460M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 17% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-460M - 132 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-460M - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-460M doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.82/FPS
100%
Price, €
€108.52
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €108.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-460M | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Arrandale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |