Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3570 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3570 is 2132 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G4900 - 172 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i5-3570 - €60.24 vs €85.58
- Up to 30% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-3570 - €0.35 vs €0.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Core i5-3570 - 54 vs 77 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €85.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
171
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3570 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
77 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |