Buy on Amazon
€69.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $399
Availability
MSRP in USD: $399
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 3467 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 84% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3800XT - €69.9 vs €424.03
- Up to 83% better value when playing Control than Ryzen 7 3800XT - €0.35 vs €2.09 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Core i5-2400S - 203 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 16 vs 4 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
199
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.9
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-2400S Sockel 1155 Core-i5 Prozessor (2500MHz, L2/L3-Cache)
Buy for €69.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 217 minutes ago
Ryzen 7 3800XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.09/FPS
16%
Price, €
€424.03
16%
FPS Winner
AMD RyzenTM Prozessor (8 Kerne/12 Threads, 32MB Cache, bis zu 4,5 GHz Max Boost) - ohne Kühler, AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
Buy for €424.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Ryzen 7 3800XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400S | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
