Buy on Amazon
€69.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $799
Availability
MSRP in USD: $799
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 2405 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 78% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €69.9 vs €311.45
- Up to 77% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €0.15 vs €0.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 6% better in DOOM Eternal than Core i5-2400S - 479 vs 452 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 24 vs 4 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
452
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.9
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-2400S Sockel 1155 Core-i5 Prozessor (2500MHz, L2/L3-Cache)
Buy for €69.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 228 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
479
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
23%
Price, €
€311.45
22%
FPS Winner
AMD RYZEN THREADRIPPER 1920X
Buy for €311.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 229 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400S | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
