Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13400F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-3550S on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3902 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-3550S.
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 17% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-3550S - 131 vs 112 FPS
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i5-3550S - €163.16 vs €242.19
- Up to 42% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-3550S - €1.25 vs €2.16 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3550S - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Core i5-3550S
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
131
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€163.16
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €163.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
Buy for €242.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-13400F | vs | Core i5-3550S |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |