Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1554 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 206 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 53% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €165.69 vs €349.99
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 24 vs 16 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €165.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74511 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
183
88.83495145631069%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€349.99
47%
Buy for €349.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74513 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
1274
55.633187772925766%
Multi-Core
7454
69.37180083759888%
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |