Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 4013 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 3% better in Control than Core i7-2600S - 205 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600S - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600S
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - €75.84 vs €138.12
- Up to 43% better value when playing Control than Core i5-12400F - €0.38 vs €0.67 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
205
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.67/FPS
56%
Price, €
€138.12
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for €138.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
199
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€75.84
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €75.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | Intel Core i7-2600S |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |