Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 3210 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 31% better in World of Warcraft than Core i5-3470 - 208 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - €72.67 vs €154.89
- Up to 38% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i5-11600KF - €0.46 vs €0.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
208
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.74/FPS
62%
Price, €
€154.89
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for €154.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9084 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
159
76%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.67
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €72.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9084 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-3470 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |