Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 659 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11600.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €148.12 vs €560.0
- Up to 73% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i9-13900F - €0.9 vs €3.35 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 2% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-11600 - 167 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600 - 32 vs 12 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
164
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.9/FPS
100%
Price, €
€148.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €148.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13939 minutes ago
Buy for €560 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13938 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |