Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 659 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11600.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Up to 67% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - €148.12 vs €450.45
- Up to 60% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - €0.32 vs €0.8 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 22% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-11600 - 565 vs 464 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600 - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
464
82%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€148.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €148.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16098 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
565
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.8/FPS
40%
Price, €
€450.45
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for €450.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16098 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |