Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 127% better in Diablo IV than FX-6300 - 216 vs 95 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - €49.68 vs €157.71
- Up to 29% better value when playing Diablo IV than Core i5-10600K - €0.52 vs €0.73 per FPS
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
216
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
71%
Price, €
€157.71
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for €157.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
Buy for €49.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600K | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |