Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4440 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4440 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2433 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4440.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 9% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-4440 - 136 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4440 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4440
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - €59.04 vs €157.71
- Up to 59% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-10600K - €0.47 vs €1.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 84 vs 95 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.16/FPS
40%
Price, €
€157.71
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for €157.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
125
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€59.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €59.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600K | vs | Intel Core i5-4440 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |