Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - €229.99 vs €508.73
- Up to 51% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-13900KF - €0.94 vs €1.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i5-10600 - 263 vs 244 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600 - 32 vs 12 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
244
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.94/FPS
100%
Price, €
€229.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €229.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
263
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.93/FPS
48%
Price, €
€508.73
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for €508.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |