Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - €229.99 vs €344.13
- Up to 24% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i7-13700F - €1.98 vs €2.59 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 15% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-10600 - 133 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600 - 24 vs 12 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
116
87%
Value, €/FPS
€1.98/FPS
100%
Price, €
€229.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €229.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12474 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
133
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.59/FPS
76%
Price, €
€344.13
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for €344.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12473 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |