Buy on Amazon
€229.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $799
Availability
MSRP in USD: $799
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600 is 994 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Performs up to 8% better in Dota 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 211 vs 195 FPS
- Up to 39% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €229.99 vs €379.64
- Up to 44% better value when playing Dota 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €1.09 vs €1.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600 - 24 vs 12 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Core i5-10600
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
211
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€229.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-10600 (Basistakt: 3,30GHz; Sockel: LGA1200; 65Watt) Box
Buy for €229.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18658 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
195
92%
Value, €/FPS
€1.95/FPS
55%
Price, €
€379.64
60%
AMD RYZEN THREADRIPPER 1920X
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18659 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Core i5-10600
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 12 |
| 12 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
