Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8130U outperforms Core i7-965 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8130U is 3375 days newer than Core i7-965.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8130U
- Performs up to 14% better in Rust than Core i7-965 - 177 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Core i7-965 - 15 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-965 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-965
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8130U - 8 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
155
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €66.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 368 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Feb 13th, 2018
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8130U | vs | Intel Core i7-965 |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 Extreme |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD 620 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |