Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8109U outperforms Core i7-965 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8109U is 3426 days newer than Core i7-965.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8109U
- Performs up to 10% better in Ready or Not than Core i7-965 - 259 vs 235 FPS
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than Intel Core i7-965 - 28 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-965 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-965
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8109U - 8 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
235
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €66.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Apr 5th, 2018
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8109U | vs | Intel Core i7-965 |
---|---|---|
Apr 5th, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 Extreme |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
28 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Iris Pro Plus | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |