Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8100 is 1767 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 2% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron G1620 - 216 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-8100 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
211
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 125 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |