Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Core i3-4170T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 864 days newer than Core i3-4170T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4170T
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-4170T - 201 vs 198 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4170T - 24 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
201
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.89/FPS
100%
Price, €
€379.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15431 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 30th, 2015
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4170T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |