Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Core i3-390M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 2405 days newer than Core i3-390M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-390M
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 12% better in Far Cry 5 than Core i3-390M - 203 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-390M - 24 vs 4 threads
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.87/FPS
100%
Price, €
€379.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4361 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-390M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Arrandale | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |