Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1620 outperforms Core i3-3227U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1620 is 36 days older than Core i3-3227U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3227U
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 17 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Performs up to 31% better in League of Legends than Core i3-3227U - 47 vs 36 FPS
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
47
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2013
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3227U | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |