Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i3-3227U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1696 days newer than Core i3-3227U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3227U
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 17 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 5% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i3-3227U - 121 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3227U - 16 vs 4 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2013
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3227U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |