Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1088 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 149 vs 148 FPS
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 120 vs 180 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
100%
Multi-Core
5794
88.75612745098039%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 12 |
| 16 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
