Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i7-5650U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 914 days newer than Core i7-5650U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 3% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i7-5650U - 344 vs 334 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5650U - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5650U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Core i7-5650U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-5650U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Single-Core
984
84.24657534246576%
Multi-Core
1866
32.20573006558509%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i7-5650U |
|---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2015 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Broadwell |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel BGA 1168 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 6000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
