Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Core i3-3217U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3869 days newer than Core i3-3217U.
Advantages of Core i3-3217U
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 31% better in Far Cry 5 than Core i3-3217U - 235 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3217U - 16 vs 4 threads
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
235
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€148.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €148.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3217U | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
17 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |