Buy on Amazon
€210.73
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Core i3-2310M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3696 days newer than Core i3-2310M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2310M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 53% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-2310M - 659 vs 430 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2310M - 12 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-11600K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
659
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€210.73
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-11600K 11. Generation Desktop Prozessor (Basistakt: 3.9GHz Tuboboost: 4.9GHz, 6 Kerne, LGA1200) BX8070811600K
Buy for €210.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-2310M
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2011
Core i5-11600K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2310M | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Core i3-2310M or Core i5-11600K
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
398 FPS
€2.89/FPS
Radeon RX 6750 XT
Core i5-11600K
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€1,149.9
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
