Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 1062 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 8% better in Rocket League than Ryzen 7 2700 - 759 vs 702 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - €129.97 vs €210.77
- Up to 32% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i5-11600K - €0.19 vs €0.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600K - 16 vs 12 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
759
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
67%
Price, €
€210.77
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for €210.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13692 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
702
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€129.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €129.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13693 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |