Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 3775 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Up to 96% cheaper than Core i9-12900 - €20.16 vs €523.87
- Up to 95% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-12900 - €0.14 vs €2.61 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 35% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G530 - 201 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 24 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
149
74%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18239 minutes ago
Buy for €523.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18239 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G530 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |