Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930T outperforms Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930T is 1948 days newer than Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron G540 - 158 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Celeron G540 - 35 vs 65 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
158
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.54
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €20.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 191 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Celeron G540 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |