Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 471 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 7% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700X - €20.54 vs €22.0
- Up to 8% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 7 2700X - €0.12 vs €0.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G3930T - 175 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 16 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
167
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.54
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 209 minutes ago
Buy for €22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 210 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |