Key Differences
In short — FX-4100 outperforms Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4100 is 38 days newer than Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Performs up to 0% better in Apex Legends than Celeron G540 - 255 vs 254 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 4 vs 2 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
255
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €20.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |