Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 275 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-8400 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 5% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G3930 - 158 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 6 vs 2 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
158
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€177.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €177.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13317 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |