Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 2192 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-13100 - 51 vs 60 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 18% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G3930 - 380 vs 322 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
380
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€164.16
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €164.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13552 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 60 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |