Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700T is 978 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i7-7700T - €15.0 vs €177.21
- Up to 90% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i7-7700T - €0.07 vs €0.73 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700T
- Performs up to 8% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Celeron G1840 - 243 vs 225 FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Celeron G1840 - 35 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 8 vs 2 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16986 minutes ago
Buy for €177.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16987 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i7-7700T |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |