Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770 is 732 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i7-3770 - €15.0 vs €154.27
- Up to 89% better value when playing Rust than Core i7-3770 - €0.1 vs €0.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 53 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 4% better in Rust than Celeron G1840 - 163 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 8 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10363 minutes ago
Buy for €154.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10363 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 77 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |