Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3240 outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3240 is 454 days older than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i3-3240 - 53 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron G1820 - 118 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
117
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |