Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800X is 2044 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3800X - €35.49 vs €290.43
- Up to 82% better value when playing War Thunder than Ryzen 7 3800X - €0.27 vs €1.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800X - 53 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
- Performs up to 49% better in War Thunder than Celeron G1820 - 197 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 16 vs 2 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
132
67%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
Buy for €290.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800X |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |