Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4560 outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G4560 is 1647 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Pentium G4560 - 35 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4560
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Celeron B820 - 113 vs 108 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
113
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €55.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4360 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | Intel Pentium G4560 |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |