Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 932 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 45% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron B815 - 300 vs 207 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 4 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron B815
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 35 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
