Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4702MQ outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4702MQ is 512 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 5% less energy than Intel Core i7-4702MQ - 35 vs 37 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4702MQ
- Performs up to 8% better in F1 22 than Celeron B815 - 265 vs 245 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 8 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | Intel Core i7-4702MQ |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | May 27th, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 37 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |