Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is 2564 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- Performs up to 12% better in Minecraft than Celeron B815 - 649 vs 578 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Celeron B815 - 15 vs 35 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 8 vs 2 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron B815
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
