Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 490 days older than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 15 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 3% better in Lost Ark than Celeron 3865U - 227 vs 221 FPS
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
227
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€52.12
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €52.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 408 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |