Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 1051 days newer than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Athlon 3000G - 15 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 6% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron 3865U - 166 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 4 vs 2 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
166
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Athlon |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |