Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 772 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 12% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron 3205U - 125 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 12 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
125
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€191.69
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €191.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 125 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Broadwell | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |