Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 1631 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 4% better in God of War than FX-8350 - 170 vs 163 FPS
- Up to 36% cheaper than FX-8350 - €99.0 vs €155.88
- Up to 40% better value when playing God of War than FX-8350 - €0.58 vs €0.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 12 vs 8 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
170
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15035 minutes ago
Buy for €155.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15034 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |