Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 122 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700 - 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 15% better in Far Cry 5 than Celeron 3205U - 206 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 8 vs 2 threads
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
206
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.77/FPS
100%
Price, €
€157.91
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €157.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15649 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |