Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Celeron 2955U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 2135 days newer than Celeron 2955U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 2955U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 12% better in Ready or Not than Celeron 2955U - 255 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 2955U - 4 vs 2 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
255
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€70.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €70.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 2955U | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Haswell | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |