Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3250 outperforms Celeron 1037U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3250 is 547 days newer than Celeron 1037U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1037U
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Pentium G3250 - 17 vs 53 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron 1037U - 192 vs 188 FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
192
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€22.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €22.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1037U | vs | Intel Pentium G3250 |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |