Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium G3250 outperforms the more expensive Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium G3250 is 1784 days newer than the more expensive Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Performs up to 2% better in Stray than Phenom II X4 830 - 177 vs 174 FPS
- Up to 18% cheaper than Phenom II X4 830 - €22.7 vs €27.62
- Up to 19% better value when playing Stray than Phenom II X4 830 - €0.13 vs €0.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 53 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 4 vs 2 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
177
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€22.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €22.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
Buy for €27.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3250 | vs | AMD Phenom II X4 830 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2009 |
Pentium | Collection | Phenom II X4 |
Haswell | Codename | Deneb |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | No |